Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caldwell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10730
Plaintiff:
GARY CALDWELL, AFUWAPE ABOLADE, BARBARA ABRAMSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, The Fire Department of New York and The Fire Department of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
GEORGES v. GALDHI et al
as 2:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
BALAZS GALDHI, JOSEPHINE P. FRIMPONG, NOELLE ZUENA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frimpong v. Everyrealm, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10487
Plaintiff:
Gatsby Frimpong
Defendant:
Everyrealm, Inc., Republic Compound LLC, Republic Operations LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
