Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Frimpong v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv03536
Plaintiff:
Eugene Frimpong
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Frimpong v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01408
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Plaintiff:
Eugene Frimpong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00859
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION
as 2:2026cv05354
Plaintiff:
DAWN WILLIAMS, TRACY WILSON, JOSIAS LEMUS and others
Defendant:
THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION doing business as DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (j) Motion to Correct Order & Judg. of Naturalization
Richard Frimpong v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1856
Petitioner:
RICHARD DARKO FRIMPONG
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General
Bayer v. Transdev North America Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01793
Plaintiff:
Walter K Bayer
Defendant:
Walter K Bayer, Transdev North America, Inc., Transdev Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Emmanuel Yirenkyi v. Attorney General United States of America
as 25-3113
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL FRIMPONG YIRENKYI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SARAH FRIMPONG v. MAUREEN DALY, et al
as 1:2025cv02756
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frimpong
Defendant:
MAUREEN DALY, MAUREEN A. DALY LIVING TRUST, LUKE RORECH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
