Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Bayer v. Transdev North America Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01793
Plaintiff:
Walter K Bayer
Defendant:
Walter K Bayer, Transdev North America, Inc., Transdev Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Emmanuel Yirenkyi v. Attorney General United States of America
as 25-3113
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL FRIMPONG YIRENKYI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SARAH FRIMPONG v. MAUREEN DALY, et al
as 1:2025cv02756
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frimpong
Defendant:
MAUREEN DALY, MAUREEN A. DALY LIVING TRUST, LUKE RORECH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jo v. California Department of Justice, et al.
as 25-2525
Plaintiff:
YOUNG YIL JO, AKA: Kum Nam Lee, Clara Cortez, Son Oswald Cesar and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, GEORGE H. WU, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge and MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge
Frimpong v. Costco Wholesale
as 1:2024cv08612
Plaintiff:
Florence Frimpong
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hairston v. Wolf et al
as 1:2024cv03420
Defendant:
Asamu, Curtis Henson, Robert Smead and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Frimpong v. Garland
as 24-5502
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN OWUSU FRIMPONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
