Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frye v. Cohen et al
as 2:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gerard Frye
Defendant:
Milia M Cohen, Gavin Christopher Newsom, California Franchise Tax Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Russell Miller and Lisa Miller
Defendant:
Scott A Miller and Robin G Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
J Rogers, Unknown Perry, L Tijerina and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez #242848 v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05623
Defendant:
Eric Miner, Unknown Williamson, Kim Seagraves and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Ted Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02669
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Joseph K Frye and Christine Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandy v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv03577
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Scott Frye, Unknown Derwin and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leander Brandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bressi
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Supervisors, Mark Napier, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01340
Plaintiff:
Barbara Frye and Eddie Frye
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mundine v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv01867
Plaintiff:
Michael Von Mundine
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, William Wiscombe, Rick A Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heckman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
James Heckman
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Parties and Scott Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
