Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Farino v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ashley J. Farino
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guadarrama v. The GEO Group, INC, et al
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Guadarrama
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Val Verde County, Warden Christopher Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Ripp et al
as 2:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Courtney D. Jordan
Defendant:
Steven Ripp, Brian Keyes, Liam Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams-Smith v. Farini
as 6:2022cv00085
Defendant:
Donald Wayne Farini and Farino
Plaintiff:
Sandra S. Wilcox Williams Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farino et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82339
Plaintiff:
Fiore Farino and Maureen Farino
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Glaxosmithkline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farino v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ashley J. Farino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. Fountainhead (BAH) LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81006
Defendant:
Kenneth V. Farino and Fountainhead (BAH) LLC
Plaintiff:
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. Fountainhead (BAH) LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81008
Defendant:
Kenneth V. Farino and Fountainhead (BAH) LLC
Plaintiff:
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward C. Acosta v. City of Chino et al
as 5:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Wes Simmons, Chris Farino, James Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARINO v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00418
Plaintiff:
ALICE FARINO
Defendant:
ABC ENTITIES (1-10), SEAN COLE, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
