Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Federal Correctional Institute Forrest City, et al
as 23-3270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Correctional Institute Forrest City and Does, BOP Medical Staff, Forrest City Low
Younger v. FCI Forrest City Medium et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Christopher Younger
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institute Forrest City, Meadows, Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. FCI - Forrest City, et al
as 22-3635
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Correctional Institute Forrest City and Does, BOP Medical Staff, Forrest City Low
Perkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays and Larry Perkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Sims v. Hendrix, et al
as 21-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph M. Sims
Defendant / Appellee:
Hendrix, Warden, Forrest City - FCI Medium, G. Rosalaza, A.W., Forrest City - FCI Medium, Champhon, Forrest City - FCI Medium and others
Sims v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Jones, Champhon, Furtrell and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Namer v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
David I Namer
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rockey v. USA et al
as 2:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
William E Rockey
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Federal Correctional Institute Forrest City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
