Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Orizaba-Zendejas
as 26-3806
Defendant:
RICARDO ORIZABA-ZENDEJAS, Fernando Lopez and Poninas
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03994
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Lopez-Robles v. Blanche
as 26-1892
Petitioner:
HENRY FERNANDO LOPEZ-ROBLES
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Armenta v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00827
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez-Armenta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00666
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez-Robles v. Blanche
as 26-230
Petitioner:
HENRY FERNANDO LOPEZ-ROBLES
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Mendez v. FCI Yazoo City Low II
as 3:2025cv00882
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez-Mendez
Defendant:
FCI Yazoo City Low II
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
