Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Gia Zamudio-Soto, et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as CAN/5:15-cv-00209
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Plaintiff:
Gia Soto-Zamudio and Fernando Soto
USA v. Fernando Soto-Rodriguez
as 15-41509
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO SOTO-RODRIGUEZ
Brown et al v. Schreiber et al
as 1:2015cv01694
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Brown , Deangelo D Adams and Ernest D Smith
Defendant:
Erik Schreiber, Matthew Sedory, Joshua Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gia Zamudio-Soto, et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00209
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Plaintiff:
Gia Soto-Zamudio and Fernando Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Soto-Mateo
as 13-2088
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LENNY FERNANDO SOTO-MATEO
US v. Soto-Mateo
as 13-2031
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LENNY FERNANDO SOTO-MATEO
Fernando Soto Vasquez v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2012cv02841
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Fernando Soto Vasquez
Soto-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2012cv00073
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Fernando Soto-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Fernando Zavala
as 11-20100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO SOTO ZAVALA, also known as Fernando Soto, also known as Fernando Soto-Zavala, also known as Fernando Arreola Soto
USA v. Francisco Soto-Martinez
as 10-50112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER SOTO-MARTINEZ, also known as Antonio Soto Martinez, also known as Alberto Cantara, also known as Alberto Alcantara Sanchez, also known as Fernando Soto Sanchez, also known as Javier Martinez-Ramirez, also known as Alberto Allandafe Sanche
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
