Cases 1 - 10 of 94
In Re: Global Fidelity Bank, Ltd
as 9:2024mc80306
Not Yet Classified:
Global Fidelity Bank, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
InnoMemory, LLC v. Fidelity Bank of Texas
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
InnoMemory, LLC
Defendant:
Fidelity Bank of Texas
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Velasquez v. Fidelity Bank et al
as 4:2023cv01093
Plaintiff:
Miguel Tapia Velasquez, Marilyn B. Warren, Ebony E Warren and others
Defendant:
Fidelity Bank, Fidelity Investments Corporate, AT&T Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
First Fidelity Bank v. Temenos U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
First Fidelity Bank
Defendant:
Temenos U.S.A., Inc. and Temenos Cloud Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dowden v. Fidelity Bank
as 21-30340
Defendant / Appellee:
Norlita Partker Wells, Minute Clerk, Fidelity Bank, Homestead and Savings Bank, Ethel S. Julien, Administrative Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Coreygerard Dowden
Dowden v. Fidelity Bank
as 2:2021cv01063
Defendant:
Norlita Parker Wells, Barbara Goude, Fidelity Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Coreygerard Dowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fidelity Bank N.A. v. Corwin
as 4:2021cv01711
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Corwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
