Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Brenda Fikes v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06866
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Walton v. Jeffrey Fikes
as 23-6599
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EARL WALTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY FIKES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Walton v. Fikes
as 5:2022hc02071
Petitioner:
James Earl Walton
Respondent:
Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fike v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03455
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fike
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Acey et al v. HMS Host USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01395
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Nason, Alexis Jumper, Dana Merklinger and others
Defendant:
Autogrill Group, Inc., HMS Host USA, Inc. and HMS Host Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blackwell v. Kinlow et al
as 5:2017ct03269
Plaintiff:
Christopher Antwan Blackwell
Defendant:
Chris Kinlow, Ruston Thompson, Heather Rahnisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bessie Barringer et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03992
Plaintiff:
Bessie Barringer , Reeshemah Adams , Sarah Bales and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v Fikes, et al
as 1:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Linwood Lamont Jones
Defendant:
J. Fikes, M. Weaver, E. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Mr. Fikes et al
as 1:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Linwood Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Mr. Fikes, Mr. Weaver, Dr. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
