Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 317
Kristin Worth, et al v. Bob Jacobson
as 23-2248
Plaintiff / Appellee: Kristin Worth, Austin Dye, Axel Anderson and others
Defendant / Appellant: Bob Jacobson, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Defendant: Kyle Burton, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mille Lacs County, Minnesota, Dan Starry, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Washington County, Minnesota and Troy Wolbersen, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Douglas County, Minnesota
Appellant: Everytown for Gun Safety, formerly known as Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, United States, State of Illinois and others
Ronald Koons, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-1900
Plaintiff / Appellee: RONALD KOONS, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC and others
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Not Yet Classified: PRESIDENT NEW JERSEY STATE SENATE and SPEAKER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Novotny et al v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01295
Plaintiff: Katherine Novotny, Sue Burke, Esther Rossberg and others
Defendant: Wesley Moore, Alison M. Healey, Scott D. Shellenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Jeremy Langley, et al v. Brendan Kelly
as 23-1827
Plaintiff / Appellee: JEREMY W. LANGLEY, TIMOTHY B. JONES and MATTHEW WILSON
Defendant / Appellant: BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, et al v. Jay R. Pritzker, et al
as 23-1828
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES OF ILLINOIS, GUNS SAVE LIFE, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellant: JAY R. PRITZKER, Governor of the State of Illinois, KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Dane Harrel, et al v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1826
Plaintiff / Appellee: DANE HARREL, C4 GUN STORE, LLC, MARENGO GUNS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Javier Herrera v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1793
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAVIER HERRERA, Doctor
Defendant / Appellee: KWAME RAOUL, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Illinois, BRENDAN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, a body politic and corporate and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION
Hartford et al v. Ferguson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05364
Plaintiff: Lawrence Hartford, Douglas Mitchell, Sporting Systems Vancouver, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Robert Ferguson, John R Batiste, John Gese and others
Amicus Curiae: Washington Gun Rights and American Firearms Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2023cv05349
Plaintiff: Lawrence Hartford, Douglas Mitchell, Sporting Systems Vancouver, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Robert Ferguson, John R Batiste, John Gese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blount v. The United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv03106
Plaintiff: Mark Jerome Johnson Blount and Mark Jerome Johnson Blount, I
Defendant: The United States of America, Merrick Garland, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?