Cases 1 - 10 of 71
BARRIOS-CORTEZ v. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv01824
Plaintiff:
SAID BARRIOS-CORTEZ
Defendant:
WEST PENN POWER COMPANY;, PENN POWER COMPANY, ABC CORPORATION 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
American Electric Power Service Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 26-1116
Petitioner:
American Electric Power Service Corporation, on behalf of its affiliates, Appalachian Power Co., Indiana Michigan Power Co., Kentucky Power Co., Kingsport Power Co., Ohio Power Co., Wheeling Power Co., AEP Appalachian Trans. Co., Inc., AEP Indiana Mi, Dayton Power and Light Company, d/b/a AES Ohio, Dominion Energy Services, Inc., on behalf of Virginia Electric and Power Co. d/b/a Dominion Energy Virginia and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Delaware Public Service Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Primoris T&D Services, LLC v. FirstEnergy Corp.
as 5:2026cv00451
Plaintiff:
Primoris T&D Services, LLC
Defendant:
FirstEnergy Corp., FirstEnergy Service Company and Jersey Central Power & Light Company
Counter-Claimant:
First Energy Corp.
Counter-Defendant:
Primoris T&D Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
1001 BROAD STREET JOHNSTOWN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
as 3:2025cv00444
Plaintiff:
1001 BROAD STREET JOHNSTOWN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
TBI CONTRACTING, INC. v. FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv01634
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TBI CONTRACTING, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
Construction Law Section of the Allegheny County Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Dorrell et al v. Constellation Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv02251
Plaintiff:
Leo Dorrell, John Dunn and Davion Chapel
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Corporation, Ameren Corporation, American Electric Power Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
PJM Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 25-1064
Petitioner:
PJM Transmission Owners, American Electric Power Service Corporation, on behalf of its affiliates, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Wheeling Power Company, AEP Appalachian Transmis, The Dayton Power and Light Company, d/b/a AES Ohio and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
American Municipal Power, Inc., PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., PJM Industrial Customer Coalition and others
American Electric Power Service Corporation v. FERC
as 25-1080
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION, on behalf of Appalachian Power Company, on behalf of Indiana Michigan Power Company, on behalf of Kentucky Power Company, on behalf of Kingsport Power Company, on behalf of Ohio Power Company, on behalf of, DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a AES Ohio, DOMINION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., on behalf of Virginia Electric & Power Company, d/b/a Dominion Energy Virginia and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
The Dayton Power & Light Company v. FERC
as 25-1073
Petitioner:
DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a AES Ohio, DOMINION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., on behalf of Virginia Electric & Power Company, d/b/a Dominion Energy Virginia, DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, Incorporated, on behalf of Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., on behalf of Duke Energy Business Services, LLC and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
