Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fishell v. The Board of Trustees of Purdue University
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Purdue University Fort Wayne and The Board of Trustees of Purdue University
Plaintiff:
John Fishell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv03032
Defendant:
. Hall, . Connlly, . Fundel and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulton v. Manton et al
as 3:2019cv03203
Defendant:
. Hall, . Clemons, John Doe, I and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Sulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Reyes v. Robert Fishel, et al
as 19-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO REYES
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF SETTLES, BRETT HENDRICKS, ROBERT FISHEL and others
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, BERNARD PYLITT, DENNIS SASSO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50306
Defendant:
J. Maher, Lucern, S. Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50301
Defendant:
J. Maher, S. Joiner, Rochelle Briney and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04777
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Bobbi George, Yiwu Lanhome Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
FISHEL v. STEIN et al
as 1:2018cv01702
Defendant:
ANDREW BORANS, JEREMY BROOK, ADAM COHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FISHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
