Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grissom v. Ard et al
as 2:2026cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bronnie Grissom
Defendant:
Curtis Ard, Patrick Robinson, Marvin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray et al v. Hamm et al
as 2:2026cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Poole, Melvin Ray, Raoul Poole and others
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Pamela Harris, Theodore Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Speaks et al
as 2:2026cv00022
Plaintiff:
Martell Wilkerson
Defendant:
Keller Speaks, Akeem Edmonds, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Williams et al
as 2:2026cv00021
Plaintiff:
Greg Clay
Defendant:
Wendy Williams, Patrick Robinson, Marvin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Patrick Clemons
as 22-4152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK FITZGERALD CLEMONS
Snell v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Snell
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, Jeffrey Sanders, M. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Haigler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Phillips
Defendant:
Anthony J. Haigler, Fitzgerald Clemons and Officer Boyeness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Cousin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Officer Contrell and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.