Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC et al v. GENTELL, INC. et al
as 0:2020cv60547
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC, Vohra Post Acute Care Physicians of Texas, PLLC, Vohra Wound Physicians of CA, P.C. and others
Defendant:
GENTELL, INC, GENTELL, INC., NEBRAS HAYAK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC et al v. GENTELL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05899
Defendant:
GENTELL, INC., WOUND CARE CONCEPTS, INC. and NEBRAS HAYAK
Plaintiff:
VOHRA WOUND PHYSICIANS OF FL, LLC, VOHRA WOUND PHYSICIANS MANAGEMENT, LLC, FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wound Care Concepts, Inc. v. Vohra Health Services, P.A.
as 0:2019cv62078
Counter Claimant:
Vohra Health Services, P.A. and Vohra Wound Physicians Management, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Wound Care Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Florida Post Acute Care Clinicians, LLC, Vohra Post Acute Care Physicians of Texas, PLLC, Vohra Post Acute Care Physicians of the East, PA and others
Consolidated Defendant:
GENTELL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drinkwater v. Port Orange Florida Post Office et al
as 6:2010cv00822
Plaintiff:
Stanley N. Drinkwater, Jr.
Defendant:
Port Orange Florida Post Office and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
