Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Mills v. Ludlam et al
as 5:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mills
Defendant:
Sandra Ludlam , Correct Care Solutions LLC and Robert Floss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breshears v. Steve et al
as 2:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Breshears
Defendant:
Jeffery Steve, Robert Floss, Amy Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Bridges v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 15-2227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Earl Bridges
Defendant - Appellee:
Corizon, Inc., Wendy Kelley, in her personal and official capacity, Rory Griffin, in his personal and official capacity (originally named as Roy Griffin) and others
Cooper v. Griswold et al
as 5:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Austin Cooper
Defendant:
Griswold, Rex G Lay, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Pinder v. Alva McDowell, et al
as 15-2033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven L. Pinder
Defendant - Appellee:
Alva Green McDowell, Health Services Administratior, Tucker MSU, Dotson, Director of Nursing, Sonya Davis-Peppers, Doctor and others
Steven Pinder v. Alva McDowell, et al
as 15-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven L. Pinder
Defendant - Appellee:
Alva Green McDowell, Health Services Administratior, Tucker MSU, Dotson, Director of Nursing, Sonya Davis-Peppers, Doctor and others
Murphy v. Hughes et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Joseph Hughes, Banard Williams, Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinder v. McDowell et al
as 5:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinder
Defendant:
Alva Green McDowell, Dotson, Sonya Davis-Peppers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Kelly et al
as 5:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Caldwell
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, D York, Floss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Floss
as 6:2014cv06002
Plaintiff:
Antoine Tatum
Defendant:
Floss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
