Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Pardue et al v. SOS AbundaBox LLC et al
as 1:2025cv04205
Plaintiff:
Christian Pardue, Mann & Pardue Properties, LLC, Keith Dunning and others
Defendant:
SOS AbundaBox LLC, Summit Services, Inc. doing business as Summit One Source, Emily Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States of America v. Real property located at 1238 W. Robin Drive, Visalia, California, Tulare County, APN: 090-041-009 et al
as 1:2025cv00820
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real property located at 1238 W. Robin Drive, Visalia, California, Tulare County, APN: 090-041-009, Real property located at 4088 Weymouth Lane, Sacramento, California, Sacramento County, APN: 049-0310-020, Forty-Two Silver Bars and others
Claimant:
Melinda Edwards and Marvin Charo Collins
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately Seven Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Two Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($779,442.44) Seized From PNC Bank N.A. Account Number Ending in 2687, And All Proceeds Trace
as 2:2025cv00967
Defendant:
Approximately Seven Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Two Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($779,442.44) Seized From PNC Bank N.A. Account Number Ending in 2687, And All Proceeds Trace
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05855
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A3QG4GFKU46UH7, CGR Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($42,835.00) in U.S. Currency
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($42,835.00) in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Benjamin Coxon et al v. The Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Coxon
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the United States, The United States Attorneys, The United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Fifteen Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and Forty-Two Cents From First Community Credit Union Account #...2070
as 4:2021mc00276
Defendant:
Fifteen Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and Forty-Two Cents From First Community Credit Union Account #...2070
Plaintiff:
United States of America
SEIZURE OF FORTY-TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS (42,425.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM A BROWN, BUICK ENCLAVE, PA LICENSE KZG1125, AND SEIZURE OF A GLOCK 19,9MM HANDGUN, BEARING et al
as 2:2020mc00108
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
SEIZURE OF FORTY-TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS (42,425.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM A BROWN, BUICK ENCLAVE, PA LICENSE KZG1125, AND SEIZURE OF A GLOCK 19,9MM HANDGUN, BEARING
United States of America v. Forty-Two Thousand, Six Hundred Fifty Dollars in United States Currency ($42,650.00) et al
as 3:2020cv00105
Defendant:
Four Thousand, Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars in United States Currency ($4,960.00), One Pair of Cartier Sunglasses, Forty-Two Thousand, Six Hundred Fifty Dollars in United States Currency ($42,650.00) and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
IN THE MATTER OF: SEIZURE OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED AND FORTY-TWO DOLLARS ($15,842.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY AND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($700.00) ENDORSED CHECK
as 2:2019mc00172
Plaintiff:
IN THE MATTER OF: SEIZURE OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED AND FORTY-TWO DOLLARS ($15,842.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY AND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($700.00) ENDORSED CHECK
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
