Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turknett v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00932
Defendant:
Faulkner County Detention Facility, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office and John Fowlkes
Plaintiff:
Hank Turknett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Ryals et al
as 4:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fowlkes
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Gary Stewart, Gary Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Ryals et al
as 4:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fowlkes
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Gary Stewart, Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Billy Garrison , Michael Cox and Sammie Brewer
Defendant:
Bobby Brown , John Randall and Johnny Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant et al v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00458
Plaintiff:
William E Bryant and Adele Kinney
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock, Everett Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garren v. Young et al
as 4:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Garren
Defendant:
Everett Young, Lloyd Vincent, Howard Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Garrison et al v. Byrd et al
as 4:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Billy Garrison , Michael Cox and Sammy Brewer
Defendant:
Karl Byrd, John Randall, Bobby Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv04161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Satchell v. Fowlkes et al
as 5:2007cv05114
Plaintiff:
Timothy Donnell Satchell
Defendant:
Clay Fowlkes, Jay Saxton, Toni Pirani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
