Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Paulsen v. Foxall et al
as 8:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Barbee, Earley, Dr. Foxall and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Paulsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Foxall et al
as 8:2014cv00211
Respondent:
Douglas County Correctional Center, Dr. Morin, Mark Foxall and others
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons, et al v. McCann, et al.
as 8:2014cv00207
Defendant:
Brenda Beadle, Bob Blanchard, City of Omaha and others
Plaintiff:
Dakota Parsons and Denice Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cotton v. Foxall
as 8:2014cv00195
Petitioner:
James Cotton
Respondent:
Foxall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUE v. THALKEN et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
THOMAS D THALKEN, JOSEPH F BATAILLON, KATHRYN KENEALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dieteman v. Lancaster County et al
as 4:2014cv03053
Plaintiff:
Cory L. Dieteman
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Douglas County Adult Detention Center, Mark Foxall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Oliveto v. Foxhall et al.
as 8:2014cv00069
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, John Doe, Mary Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oliveto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Douglas County Correctional Center et al
as 8:2013cv00285
Defendant:
"Tammy", Douglas County Correctional Center, Mark Foxall and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woodruff v. Foxall
as 8:2013cv00261
Respondent:
Mark Foxall
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
