Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WHITE v. BOOTS et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE
Defendant:
MATTHEW BOOTS and BRIDGETT FOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAME-BEY v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC., JASON G. CARTER, EMRY MCALEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. BURKHART et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. DRURY
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, BRIDGER D. FOY, JOHN LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson et al v. ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00259
Defendant:
Rashon Richardson, Latarasha Foy-Richardson, Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
SNYDER v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PATRICK SNYDER
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY BURKHART, BRIDGET FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAME-BEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01986
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, PAUL TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. KEIFFINER et al
as 2:2018cv00478
Defendant:
JOHN KEIFFINER, RANDALL SORRELL, BRIDGET FOY and others
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN MICHAEL COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Seay v. Foy et al
as 4:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Herbert D Seay
Defendant:
Bridget Foy, Aaron Fawver, Jarrod Bradbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
