Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pritter v. Reizer
as 3:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Curtis Pritter and Michael Francios-Bey
Defendant:
Warden S. Reizer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TURNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11398
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLES FRANCIOS TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. Francios et al
as 1:2020cv00670
Defendant:
Gaspard Francios and LG Way LLC
Plaintiff:
Wanda Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Lumsdon v. Detention Technician et al
as 0:2019cv61209
Defendant:
Sgt. Quest, Detention Technician and Deputy Francios
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Lumsdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alraimouny et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11862
Plaintiff:
Angelo Pernicone, Kathleen Pollak, Robert Maguire and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
POWELL et al v. BERGENFIELD BOE et al
as 2:2017cv13083
Plaintiff:
ZENA L. POWELL and T. T. P.
Defendant:
BERGENFIELD BOE , SHANE BIGGINS , DANA MASSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sennet v. St Martin Parish Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
DeMarqus D Sennet
Defendant:
St Martin Parish Correctional Facility, U H C, Ronald J Theriot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirville v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv22636
Plaintiff:
Dgeff Francios Mirville
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
Jumar K Jones
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Jim Schwochert, Scott Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 17-2005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING A PRESENT OR FUTURE INTEREST, PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE CHESTERFIELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
