Cases 41 - 50 of 5,958
BOYER v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
FRANK BOYER
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Frank Paul
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRNE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2023cv05066
Plaintiff:
FRANK JAMES BYRNE, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFREY SMITH, BERKS COUNTY JAIL FOOD DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LT. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tufano v. Levy et al
as 3:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
Jake Levy, Better Life Foods Inc., Legalinc Corporate Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank Nellom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-3215
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
USA v. Jerome Brown
as 23-3184
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME FRANK BROWN, a/k/a Jerome F Brown
FRANK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv23020
Plaintiff:
PAIGE M FRANK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TREVOR v. BRESLIN
as 2:2023cv04955
Plaintiff:
GREEN MUNYIR TREVOR and GREEN MUNIYR TREVOR
Defendant:
FRANK BRESLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ason Brown v. Dwayne Lardin, et al
as 23-3115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DWAYNE LARDIN, CAPTAIN STEPHANIE FRANK, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BOYER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
