Cases 41 - 50 of 13,994
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwenk v. Frank
as 9:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Trevin Schwenk
Defendant:
Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellard v. Frank Aguillera et al
as 4:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Reginald Whitfield Bellard
Defendant:
Frank Aguillera, Officer J. Tzaquitzal, Steven Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Monaco Bazzo v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grof v. Dinello et al
as 9:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Robert Grof
Defendant:
David Dinello, Marina Medved, Gerald Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Victor Anderson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robert Richeson, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
