Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Haverkamp et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 8:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Frank X. Haverkamp and Mary E. Haverkamp
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Francisco Carbajal v. Mona Houston
as 21-70030
Respondent:
MONA D. HOUSTON
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO XAVIER CARBAJAL, AKA Frank X. Carbajal, Jr.
Francisco Carbajal v. Food Services, et al
as 20-56200
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOD SERVICES, official capacity, T. NESBITT, Health Care Compliance Analyst, individual and official capacity, J. GANDARA, Health Case Appeals Coordinator, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO XAVIER CARBAJAL, AKA Frank X. Carbajal, Jr.
Francisco Carbajal v. Ralph Diaz
as 20-15535
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO XAVIER CARBAJAL, AKA Frank X. Carbajal, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR
Vue v. Henke et al
as 5:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ong Vue
Defendant:
Frank X Henke, Ernest E Haynes, Michael W Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Patrick et al
as 2:2018cv01206
Plaintiff:
Shahem Galloway
Defendant:
Leak Frank X, Johnson Charles S, Samuel Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv05406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carbajal v. Kernan
as 1:2017cv01413
Petitioner:
Frank X. Carbajal, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acocella v. BMW of Freeport et al
as 2:2017cv05593
Plaintiff:
Frank X. Acocella
Defendant:
Automotive Management Services, Inc., BMW Financial Services NA, LLC and BMW of Freeport
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
FARAGALLA v. JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2017cv03604
Plaintiff:
SAMY FARAGALLA
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY , MORTON OTUNDO, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
