Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00762
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MARTIN v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR TIOGA FRANKLIN SAVINGS BANK
as 2:2026cv07152
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. MARTIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR TIOGA FRANKLIN SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strasburg-Franklin Local Schools v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10458
Plaintiff:
Strasburg-Franklin Local Schools
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOWDEN v. FORSYTH COUNTY COURTS
as 1:2026cv00942
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BOWDEN, JR.
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY COURTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04370
Plaintiff:
Franklin Guzman
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05387
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FRANKLIN v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv11905
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FRANKLIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
