Cases 41 - 50 of 3,601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilson v. Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA, Farm Credit Mid-America, FLCA, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
BUDZEL v. FRANKLIN BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
LUKAS BUDZEL
Defendant:
FRANKLIN BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC MOSCHBERGER, GUS PROTOGEROPOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Westfal v. Westfal
as 24-221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RICHARD WESTFAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL FRANKLIN WESTFAL, KENNETH C. GLASSMAN, BRENNAN DOYLE and others
Franklin v. Hepburn
as 1:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Leslie Gail Franklin
Defendant:
Shari Kris Hepburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ej Fed. Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Rodriguez-Santamaria, et al. v. Garland
as 24-389
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ENOC RODRIGUEZ-SANTAMARIA, MORENA ABIGAIL TORRES-HERNANDEZ and MAYERLI ESTEFANI RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
