Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hampton et al v. Cortez et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III, Fred Johnson, Terry Mays and others
Defendant:
Patrick Page Cortez, Clay Schexnayder and John Bel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gooden
as 22-30321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fred Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Gooden, Lieutenant
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gooden
as 3:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Stephen Williams, David White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Yang v. MO Dept of Corrections, et al
as 15-2231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Yang
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi, Director, MDOC, John Doe and others
Delay v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2014cv01937
Plaintiff:
Dallas Ray Delay
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Dwayne V. Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delay v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2014cv04293
Plaintiff:
Dallas Ray Delay
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Dwayne V Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Williams v. Judith Silvey, et al
as 14-2934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest Cornelius Williams
Plaintiff:
Dorris Ellis Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Judith Silvey, Correctional Officer I, Potosi Correctional Center, Sarah Whitener, Correctional Officer II, Potosi Correctional Center, Unknown Menteer, Sergeant, Correctional Officer II, Potosi Correctional Center and others
Fred Johnson v. Darin Young, et al
as 14-1922
Petitioner - Appellant:
Fred Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden and Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
