Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13600
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Kevin Alire, James Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2025cv01229
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Kevin Alire, James Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00523
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46878
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Blankship et al
as 2:2020cv02031
Defendant:
Dr. Blankship, Unknown Medical Personnel, Wexford Healthcare Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thompson Fred and Fred Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sun-Allah v. Stirling et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Khalil-Divine Black Sun-Allah
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Michael McCall, Michael Wentz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
