Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sinapi v. Rhode Island Board of Examiners et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Sinapi
Defendant:
Rhode Island Board of Bar Examiners , David A. Wollin, Esq. , Mellissa K. Burnett-Testa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
A.B. et al v. Holliman et al
as 1:2014cv07897
Plaintiff:
A. B. , R. B. and Rochelle Vermeulen
Defendant:
Carolyn Holliman, Clara Yanes, Alexis Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frias v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05928
Defendant:
Police Officers "John Doe" 1-2, Lt. Lanier Glenn and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jose Frias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Frias v. Arturo Torrez, et al
as 14-10018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL FRIAS
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTURO TORREZ, United States Customs and Border Protection Officer, formerly known as John Doe and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
