Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Drummond v. Thompson et al
as 2:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Drummond
Defendant:
Charles E Thompson, Steven J Frost, Nicholas S Peacock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
William Sepatis v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 09-16537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SEPATIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SEAN FROST and FREDERICK SCHIFF
BYRD v. FROST et al
as 2:2008cv04949
Plaintiff:
DENNIS O. BYRD
Defendant:
MICHAEL FROST and CREDIT ACCEPTANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Been, et al v. O.K. Industries, Inc., et al
as 08-7078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES BEEN, individually, DBA Creekside Farm, Inc., DONALD FROST, EDWIN JOHNSTON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
O.K. INDUSTRIES, INC., an Arkansas corporation and as administrator of health and benefit plans, O.K. FOODS, INC., an Arkansas corporation and as administrator of health and benefit plans, O.K. FARMS, INC., an Arkansas corporation and as administrator of health and benefit plans and others
Defendant:
KEN PRIMM, RANDALL GOINS, individually and as trustee of health and benefit plans, TOM WEBB, individually and as trustee of health and benefit plans and others
Sepatis v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2008cv02497
Plaintiff:
William Sepatis and William Sepatis
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Sean Frost and Frederick Schiff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jacobs, et al v. Tapscott, et al
as 07-10558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARIN JACOBS, PATRIA JACOBS and JOEANN FROST
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM K TAPSCOTT and BARON & BUDD PC
Been, et al v. OK Industries Inc, et al
as 6:2002cv00285
Plaintiff:
Charles Been , Donald Frost , Edwin Johnston and others
Defendant:
Ken Primm , O.K. Industries, Inc. , O.K. Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
