Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fuller v. Internal Revenue Service (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
David Gayne Fuller
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
United States of America v. Fuller et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frederick J. Fuller, Raymond C. Green Funding, LLC, Nichole Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
United States of America v. Estate of William H. Fuller et al
as 2:2021cv11554
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of William H. Fuller and Susan J. Hamon
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Fuller v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harry M. Fuller, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Fuller v. D L Peterson Trust Co et al
as 5:2017cv00408
Defendant:
School Board of DeSoto Parish, United Healthcare , Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Interpleader:
McLawrence Fuller , Adam Keys , National Oilwell Varco L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Roger Byrne v. USA, et al
as 10-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER BYRNE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIC C. KUS and BERNARD D. FULLER
Roger Byrne v. USA, et al
as 10-2080
Plaintiff:
ROGER BYRNE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC C. KUS
Defendant:
BERNARD D. FULLER
McInnes v. Reese and Howell, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01034
Plaintiff:
Joe McInnes and Joe McInnes
Defendant:
Reese and Howell, Inc., State of Alabama Department of Revenue, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fuller et al v. United States of America
as 8:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Fuller and Kyoko I. Fuller
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
