Cases 1 - 10 of 55
PUCKETT v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2026cv01175
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY M. PUCKETT
Defendant:
JAMES W. SHAFFER, GWENDOLYN HORTH, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Braun et al
as 3:2026cv00261
Plaintiff:
Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Braun, Eric J Holcomb, Gwendolyn M Horth and others
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ANDERSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2025cv01212
Plaintiff:
DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
ROBBIE JOHNSON, ADAM KEGG, DREW ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE-BEY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2025cv00753
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 3:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
HUBERT D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANTU v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01866
Respondent:
FRENCH, WARDEN, GWEN HORTH and others
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
