Cases 21 - 30 of 482
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16579
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G. JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McBride v. Jones et al
as 9:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
G. Jones, D. Gleason and A. Frederickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 6:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Jones
Defendant:
Doug Richardson, Stuart Sarrat, Brandon Prino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lloyd v. Telleen et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 9:2022cv02161
Petitioner:
Edward G. Jones
Respondent:
Doug Richardson, Stuart Sarrat and Director of the Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
McBride v. Jones et al
as 9:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
G. Jones, A. Fredericksen and D. Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04152
Plaintiff:
Miriam Nathan
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Edward M. Christie, III, Carlton D. Donaway and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Marcus v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03911
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marcus
Defendant:
Edward M. Christie, III, Spirit Airlines, Inc., H. McIntyre Gardner and others
Horton v. Jones
as 9:2022cv00382
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Horton
Respondent:
G. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
