Cases 11 - 20 of 62
(PC) Reyes v. Rouch et al
as 1:2019cv01158
Defendant:
Patricia Rouch, Edgar Clark, G. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Abel P Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Franklin v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2019cv06255
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Moore, E. Delgadillo, Lieutenant A. H. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00413
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Airington et al
as 3:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
Francisco G. Rodriguez
Defendant:
David Airington and Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Mark Rodriguez
as 17-50441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, also known as Mark Rodriguez, also known as Jacob Rodriguez, also known as Jacob G. Rodriguez, also known as Mark A. Rodriguez
Steger v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv02093
Defendant:
D. Beal, Brian Belleque, Benaviedez and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Steger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv04397
Petitioner:
JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. BROWN
as 2:2016cv00183
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Travis Williams v. John Soto et al
as 2:2015cv05691
Defendant:
Lt G. Marshall, Lt G. Marshall, Correctional Officer Moisa and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Rodriguez v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv00339
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and R. Baker
Petitioner:
Edward G. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.