Cases 1 - 10 of 100
White et al v. Kind, LLC
as 1:2026cv07641
Plaintiff:
Robin White, Armando Castro and Tera Henry-Shook
Defendant:
Kind, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Pickles v. Etienne et al
as 8:2026cv02556
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Pickles
Defendant:
Michael Orphee Etienne, Detective Justin Shook, Sergeant Joshua Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brawley v. Lefevers
as 1:2026cv00539
Petitioner:
Andrea Shook Brawley and Andrea Elizabeth Shook
Respondent:
Alderson FPC Warden Lefevers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Shook
as 3:2026cv05983
Petitioner:
Ambrose David Jackson
Respondent:
David Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Givens v. Horch et al
as 3:2026cv05959
Plaintiff:
Toriandre Tyshawn Givens
Defendant:
John Horch and David Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chao v. Shook
as 3:2026cv05913
Petitioner:
Steve P Chao
Respondent:
David Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pickles v. Etienne et al
as 8:2026cv02311
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Pickles
Defendant:
Michael Orphee Etienne, Detective Justin Shook, Sargeant Joshua Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Shook
as 3:2026cv05836
Petitioner:
Kevin Bernard Wright
Respondent:
David Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Waller v. Shook
as 3:2026cv05738
Petitioner:
Brandon Elliot Waller
Respondent:
David Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
