Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alhorsome v. Macias et al
as 1:2026cv05758
Plaintiff:
Taher Alhorsome
Defendant:
Martha Macias, Derec Walzberg, Dena M. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2026cv01873
Plaintiff:
Leisa Gail Duncan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MUMME et al v. PROGRESSIVE PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
as 1:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN F MUMME and GAIL R MUMME
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
PSIROGIANES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01020
Petitioner:
GAIL PSIROGIANES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
McMurray v. Matos et al
as 1:2026cv06072
Plaintiff:
Marcellus McMurray
Defendant:
Jo Ann Matos, Gail, Brittone Butters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BURKE v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2026cv08495
Plaintiff:
GAIL BURKE
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
