Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gary Robinson v. Jerry Higgins, et al
as 23-5933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY N. HIGGINS, JUDGE MARY M. SHAW, CAROLE C. SCHNEIDER and others
Robinson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Higgins et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry N. Higgins, Mary Shaw, Carole C. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Robinson v. Higgins
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jerry N Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Martin Robinson v. Shirley Saffold, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
ARROW BROCKLER, HANNA M. SMITH, Assistant Prosecutor, JOHN DOE, Court Appointed Attorney, Berea Seven Hills and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
GARY ROBINSON, et al.
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAPUSCINSKI v. CITY OF GIBRALTER et al
as 2:2017cv11281
Defendant:
CITY OF GIBRALTER , CITY OF ROCKWOOD, GARY ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KAPUSCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bunch v. Claiborne County et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Melinda Bunch
Defendant:
Claiborne County , David Ray , David Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
