Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mescall v. Renaissance at Antiquity et al
as 3:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Gerald Thomas Mescall
Defendant:
Renaissance at Antiquity, Gem Management LLC, National Apartment Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Williams v. Gem Management
as 6:2022cv01062
Plaintiff:
Reggie Williams
Defendant:
Gem Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HACKETT v. WOODCREST ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH BOSTON, LP et al
as 1:2018cv00841
Plaintiff:
CAROL HACKETT
Defendant:
WOODCREST ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH BOSTON, LP, WOODCREST VA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, GEM MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley v. Five Gems Management Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09448
Plaintiff:
Joyce Mobley
Defendant:
Five Gems Management Corp., Grenville Owners' Corp. and Ron Edelstein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tuman et al v. VL GEM LLC et al
as 7:2015cv07801
Plaintiff:
Jessica Tuman and Daniel Kurtz
Defendant:
VL GEM LLC, GEM Management Partners LLC, George Nukho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3604
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Divetro v. The Housing Authority of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2013cv01878
Plaintiff:
Denise Divetro
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of Myrtle Beach and GEM Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. GEM Management, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00683
Plaintiff:
Kerri M. Williams and Tammy Brutley
Defendant:
GEM Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
