Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Buckingham v. Lewis General Tires, Inc.
as 19-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant: Walter Buckingham
Defendant / Appellee: Lewis General Tires, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv06264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas v. Continental Tire North America, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55145
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOYO TIRE HOLDINGS OF AMERICAS, INC., a California corporation, as successor in interest to Toyo Tire International, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: CONTINENTAL TIRE NORTH AMERICA, INC., an Ohio corporation as successor in interest to General Tire, Inc., YOKOHAMA CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a California corporation and GTY TIRE COMPANY, an Ohio general partnership
Emerald Equipment Leasing, Inc v. Sea Star Line, LLC
as 09-2309
Plaintiff - Appellant: EMERALD EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SEA STAR LINE, LLC
Garnishee - None: ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AIM CARRIBEAN EXPRESS, INC., APL LOGISTICS WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Emerald Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Sea Star Line, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02808
Plaintiff: Emerald Equipment Leasing, Inc. and Emerald Equipment Leasing, Inc.
Defendant: Sea Star Line, LLC
Garnishee: The Master or Custodian of the M/V EL FARO, its engines, tackle and apparel, ABF Freight System, Inc., AIM Carribean Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
Lockett v. Nissan Motor Company et al
as 2:2009cv00080
Plaintiff: Jared Wesley Lockett
Defendant: Nissan Motor Company, Nissan North America, Inc., Continental Tire North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
United States, et al v. Albert Investment Company, Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6267
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., APAC ARKANSAS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
United Steel, Paper and Forest v. Continental Tire North America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1778
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL-CIO/CLC and LOCAL NO. 850L
Defendant - Appellant: CONTINENTAL TIRE NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CTNA HEALTH PLAN, Health Plan, Pension Plan for Hourly-Paid Employees of Continental General Tire, Inc. and Certain Affiliated Companies and PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY-PAID EMPLOYEES OF CONTINENTAL GENERAL TIRE, INCORPORATED AND CERTAIN AFFILIATED COMPANIES
United States of America et al v. Albert Investment Co Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00637
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant: Albert Investment Co Inc, American Airlines Inc, APAC Arkansas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Other Statutes None
United Steelworkers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC et al v. Continental Tire North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00074
Defendant: Continental Tire North America, Inc., Continental Tire North America, Inc., Continental Tire North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC, Local No. 850L and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?