Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC, Corporate Successor to Western Auto Parts Inc, A Delaware Corporation, ALCO PRODUCTS INC, a New York Corporation, ALLIS CHALMERS CORP, a Delaware Corporation and others
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, A Delaware Corporation, AKA Allied Signal
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC, Corporate Successor to Western Auto Parts Inc, A Delaware Corporation, ALCO PRODUCTS INC, a New York Corporation, ALLIS CHALMERS CORP, a Delaware Corporation and others
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
