Cases 1 - 10 of 127
CRAWFORD v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
SEAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, GEORGE ROBERTS, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Roberts, Jr. v. State of New Jersey
as 24-1240
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBERTS, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
KNECHT v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
JOHN KNECHT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE ROBERTS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2023cv00265
Petitioner:
GEORGE ROBERTS, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEN HOLLIBAUGH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv04031
Plaintiff:
SHAWN D TAYLOR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN RONALD PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv03754
Petitioner:
GEORGE ROBERTS, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. George Pompura
as 23-1464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE ROBERT-LEE POMPURA
John Demos, Jr. v. John Roberts, et al
as 22-36069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GEORGE ROBERTS, SARA SIMMONS and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Pompura v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
George Robert-Lee Pompura
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Demos v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
John George Roberts, Sara Simmons and Scott S Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
