Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Stanley v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00860
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Stanley
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nealy v. Vasquez
as 5:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Nealy, Jr
Defendant:
N Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nealy v. Vasquez
as 1:2014cv00569
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Nealy, Jr
Respondent:
N Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owens v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Owens
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Ray v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01839
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Franklin Carter Allen and Zack Vines
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roysden et al v. Fort Lauderdale et al
as 0:2014cv61469
Plaintiff:
Patricia Roysden and Glen Edward Roysden
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale, Franklin Adderly, Billy Charles Koepke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glen Byars, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50502
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLEN EDWARD BYARS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv14130
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Hall
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Hall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray et al v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2013cv01860
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Ray, Jr and Glen Edward Ray, Sr
Defendant:
Calhoun County , Calhoun County Sheriff's Office , Calhoun County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
