Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: David Bridges
Defendant: Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gomez v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01169
Petitioner: Jerome Gomez
Respondent: Warden Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramos et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01439
Plaintiff: Armando Ramos, Albert Ferreira, Cynthia Fountain and others
Defendant: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gomez v. Dungarvin Connecticut LLC
as 3:2021cv01503
Plaintiff: Amarea Gomez
Defendant: Dungarvin Connecticut LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Contreras v. Gomez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01307
Plaintiff: Olga P. Contreras
Defendant: Ivan Dario Gomez
Gomez-Rodriguez v. Reddi Rooster Too, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Plaintiff: Alex Gomez-Rodriguez
Defendant: Madalyne Keegan and Reddi Rooster Too, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00296
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA v. $2,700.00 Dollars In United States Currency et al
as 3:2021cv00141
Claimant: Michael Gomez
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $2,700.00 Dollars In United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Gomez v. Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00958
Defendant: Caron, Canales, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff: Juan M. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?