Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Brent v. Fred Parris Towers et al
as 4:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Nicole S Brent
Defendant:
Fred Parris Towers, Gorman Properties and Metropolitan Housing Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Pittman v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv05090
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Sheriff Lafayette Woods, Chief Joseph Gorman, Lieutenant Joyce Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Gorman et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Darryl Elkins, Joyce Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Landon M Bryant
Defendant:
Steven Jones, Sam Baker, Cody Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Iverson et al
as 4:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Percy Little, Jr
Defendant:
Iverson, Darrell Elkins, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorman v. Jones
as 5:2022cv05170
Plaintiff:
Tommy Gorman
Defendant:
Steven Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gorman v. Jones
as 5:2022cv05168
Plaintiff:
Tommy Gorman
Defendant:
Steven Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Frazier v. Browley et al
as 4:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Judy Browley, Joseph Gorman, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Guynn et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Alex Guynn, William Howard, Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
