Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Shehadeh v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv03267
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shehadeh
Defendant:
Gregory K Harris and Sarah E. Seberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Shehadeh v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shehadeh
Defendant:
Gregory K Harris and Matthew Weir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael F. Henry v. USA, et al
as 22-1841
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KWAME RAOUL, VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Government Under Illinois Law and others
Barlow III v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow III
Defendant:
Freda Wolfson, Roger Taney, Garret E Brown Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
United States of America, Kwame Raoul, Illinois Attorney General, U.S. Attorney Gregory K. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Grant v. Cheney et al
as 0:2021cv00075
Defendant:
James A Baker, III, Caspar Weinberger, Richard Bruce Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Haspel et al
as 1:2019cv02265
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris, Gina Haspel and Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Grant v. Harris et al
as 8:2019cv02284
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris, Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Harris et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris and Joint Chiefs of Staff Defendants
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Grant v. Harris et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Defendant:
AUSA Gregory K. Harris and Joint Chiefs of Staff
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
