Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McCarthy v. Philippine Airlines, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00276
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas McCarthy
Defendant:
Philippine Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy v. Doe(s)
as 2:2026cv00261
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas McCarthy
Defendant:
John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2026pq00739
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hogan v. Collins
as 26-1220
Claimant:
GREGORY THOMAS HOGAN
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Thomas v. United States of America
as 25-2364
Petitioner:
GREGORY THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brown et al v. ELV Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv01042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brown, Allen Leder, Jaden Leder and others
Defendant:
Christopher Vani, ELV Energy Services, Inc. and Charles Gregory Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
DePersio v. Remote Cleaning Academy LLC
as 0:2025cv61485
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas DePersio
Defendant:
Remote Cleaning Academy LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DePersio v. Remote Cleaning Academy LLC
as 0:2025cv61484
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas DePersio
Defendant:
Remote Cleaning Academy LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv06843
Plaintiff:
Lovell Moore, Robert Bobby Eller, James Enix and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
