Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05692
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GROVER LEE ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AIZEN v. LEE et al
as 3:2018cv15195
Plaintiff:
LANCE AIZEN
Defendant:
CHARLES E. LEE 2012 TRUST NO. 2, GROVER LEE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, JACQUELINE C. LEE 2012 TRUST NO. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Grover Lee Deary et al v. CitiFinancial Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01199
Defendant:
All Known and Unknown Persons, CitiFinancial Servicing LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Grover Lee Deary and Marie Deary
Miskovsky v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00787
Plaintiff:
Grover Lee Miskovsky
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Justin Jones, Jim Rabon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 8:2014cv02821
Plaintiff:
Grover Lee Simmons
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hunt v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv04396
Plaintiff:
Grover Lee Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Gladyse C. Taylor, Rebecca Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miskovsky, et al v. Jones, et al
as 10-6181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GROVER LEE MISKOVSKY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIM RABON, Sentence Administrator and others
Miskovsky v. Jones
as 5:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Grover Lee Miskovsky
Defendant:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grover Miskovsky v. Eric Franklin
as 08-6005
Petitioner - Appellant:
GROVER LEE MISKOVSKY
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC FRANKLIN, Warden
Dunigan v. Parker
as 2:2006cv02729
Petitioner:
Grover Lee Dunigan
Respondent:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
