Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Capen, et al v. Campbell
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. CAPEN and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
BRADY, MARCH FOR OUR LIVES, GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Capen et al v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv11431
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Capen and National Association for Gun Rights
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey and Charles D. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. Two Gun Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Two Gun Construction LLC, Architectural Fireplaces of New England Inc., Hearth Designs LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Estados Unidos Mexicanos v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11269
Plaintiff:
Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Beretta USA Corp. and others
Amicus Curiae:
International Law Professors, Non-Party Proposed Amici, Professors Of Transnational Litigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCCARTHY et al v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv10701
Plaintiff:
TROY CITY TACTICAL LLC, LAURIE WARNER, WILLIAM R. BIEWENGA and others
Defendant:
CHARLES D. BAKER, MATTHEW SONNABEND, ROBERT F. RUFO and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., GUN OWNERS ACTION LEAGUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedrone, LLC et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv40041
Plaintiff:
Gun Owners of America, Brophy's Fine Firearms, Inc., Cedrone, LLC and others
Defendant:
Governor Charles Duane Baker, Jr and Attorney General Maura T. Healey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tomelleri v. Taunton Rod and Gun, Inc.
as 1:2019cv12469
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Tomelleri
Defendant:
Taunton Rod and Gun, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Pullman Arms, Inc., et al v. Healey
as 18-1331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC., PAPER CITY FIREARMS, LLC, PULLMAN ARMS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
