Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GLENN v. GLADSEN
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant: STEVEN GLADSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant: GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. THORPE & SONS AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff: GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant: THORPE & SONS AUTOMOTIVE and JOHN K THORPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. New York Police Deptartment
as 23-236
Plaintiff / Appellant: Gurley E. Glenn
Defendant / Appellee: New York Police Deptartment, NewYork Police Deptartment of Brooklyn and Six Police Officers of
Norman Glenn v. Gurley Glenn
as 22-1872
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORMAN G. GLENN and ALSTON WARDELL GLENN
Defendant / Appellant: GURLEY E. GLENN
GLENN et al v. GLENN
as 1:2021cv00510
Defendant: GURLEY E. GLENN
Plaintiff: NORMAN G. GLENN and ALSTON WARDELL GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Gurley Glenn
as 21-1270
Petitioner: In re: GURLEY E. GLENN
GLENN v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00634
Plaintiff: GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant: CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gurley Glenn v. Metech Recycling, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1687
Defendant / Appellee: METECH RECYCLING, INC., ANDREW MCMANUS, Chief Executive Officer, Creedmoor, N. C. Facility and MIKE MCMORROW, Chief Financial Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: GURLEY E. GLENN
GLENN v. METECH RECYCLING INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01066
Defendant: ROBERT LAUGHLIN, REX CHANG and METECH RECYCLING INC.
Plaintiff: GURLEY E. GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?