Cases 11 - 20 of 5,918
Guzman v. Walmart
as 3:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Vela v. Medeles, et al.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and The City of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shallowhorn v. Lopez, et al.
as 24-2484
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
R. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, Y. CASTILLO, Correctional officer, H. MOSELEY, Correctional Officer and others
Guzman Velasco, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2429
Petitioner:
MARIA GUZMAN VELASCO, CAMILA ECHEVERRIA GUZMAN and NAYELI ECHEVERRIA GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Jose Guzman-Dominguez
as 24-2063
Petitioner:
JOSE REMBERTO GUZMAN-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rose et al v. Lobo Luxur Bar Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
Andra Cheri Rose, Dessie Pilek, Jessica Hinton and others
Defendant:
Lobo Luxur Bar Inc. doing business as The Luxur and The Luxur Kitchen & Cocktails, Inc. doing business as Hacienda Calavera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Guzman-Perez, et al v. Ojeda-Batista
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
JENNIE GUZMAN-PEREZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
MANUEL OJEDA-BATISTA, PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT CORP. and MOB INVESTMENT CORP.
Soloway v. ALM Global, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02925
Plaintiff:
Brett Soloway
Defendant:
ALM Global, LLC and Hugo Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
