Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barbosa Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4217
Petitioner:
FERNANDO BARBOSA SILVA, PALOMA RAFAELLA GOMES MARTINS and GABRIEL MARTINS SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martin v. Marquette Transportation Company, LLC
as 2:2023cv02706
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Martin
Defendant:
Marquette Transportation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
LOPEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
GABRIEL MARTIN LOPEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03288
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYATT et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03181
Plaintiff:
JAMES ACUFF, JACOB RAMSEL, AARON BROOKS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wyatt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02141
Plaintiff:
James Acuff, Jacob Ramsel, Aaron Brooks and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
USA v. Gabriel Reed
as 18-50145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GABRIEL MARTIN REED
Martins et al v Jose M.B. Martins, et al.
as 1:2017cv10956
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle B Martins and Jose Antonio Barros Martins
Defendant:
Jose M.B. Martins, Gabriel Martins, ExxonMobil Savings Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Clyde Ward, et al v. MERS, et al
as 14-15491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE WARD, CLYDE MCPHATTER, LEROY WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, WASHINGTON MUTUAL SECURITIES, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
