Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crippin #682304 v. Strickland et al
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Devin James-Richard Crippin #682304
Defendant:
Unknown Strickland, Unknown Hicks, Unknown Armio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proto Gage, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
as 23-1930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PROTO GAGE, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Clifford et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Cheyeene R Clifford, Jessica Harper, Clifford's Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Waxler v. All Green Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Gage Waxler
Defendant:
All Green Transport, LLC, Charles E Fisher and Charles E. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sapphire v. AEY Holdings, LLC
as 1:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Nicole Sapphire
Defendant:
AEY Holdings, LLC d/b/a Gage Cannabis Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gage v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Calvin Gage
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, George Mellos, Brandy Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Allen v. Pero et al (JRG2)
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Wilfred Allen
Defendant:
gage alan Pero, Patricia Pero and Michel Pero
Interested Party:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gage v. Vision Path
as 1:2022cv01196
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Bond Lonon
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gage
Defendant:
Vision Path
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
